Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 03.06.2008, 12:03 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,262 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29882
По умолчанию

Two observations:

1. We must not forget that the national museums are a great number of works of modern art for free - in Europe they are often transferred as payment for inheritance tax the heirs of the artist or collector, by the United States has the ability to pay income tax by transferring to a museum of his work; in anywhere in the world the artist willingly submits them to the gift in major museums.

2. Unlike the "big" museums, which rarely sell imeyushiesya in the collection of things (actually, the state museums did not have the right to do so, they must seek permission from the government or parliament), "small" private museums often sell the purchased several decades ago, the product Artists, meanwhile, lost its "relevance"

I remember that I tried to draw your attention to the origin of Komar and Melamid, sold at auction in the autumn Mac Dougall, to quote him:

Provenance: Ludwig Museum, Vienna, Austria.
Private collection, USA

and leave you to draw conclusions themselves (in general, in auction catalogs the most interesting - not images).



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
 
Loading...