Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 31.08.2009, 20:52 Язык оригинала: Русский       #10
Guest
 
Сообщений: n/a
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Maroussia Посмотреть сообщение
there is a chance only if you are not going to tell everyone that your parents brought pictures in the museum "as unnecessary," and will argue that the parents brought pictures in storage. " Then the lawyer will tell you the way, too, recommend inviting.
I agree, "as superfluous," sounds not in favor of enforceability, but also to write something that was not deposited nado.Peredacha involves drawing up an appropriate instrument, in duplicate, with a list of the stored, shelf life. And all this is assured by a notary. Such records No, and invent - a vredit.Nachinat be with the rights of the museum at the pictures. And to do this correctly to make a claim for recognition of the rights of citizens to inherit the artistic heritage deda.Esli court will not refuse, and recognizes the next step - the legality of stay in the museum . The court will request a complete list of museum pieces of the artist and documents in possession. If the museum does not submit the documents, the court may decide in favor of the plaintiff - naslednika.Zdes must take into account that the museum is the state. 'll Have to make concessions. But to do this is to reach, not spending enough money ... The most expensive civil case - imuschestvennye.Kto pays - that's right.



  Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо за это полезное сообщение:
vasya85 (01.09.2009)