Цитата:
Сообщение от Ukhtomsky
The author tries to justify the statement of Nadezhda Mandelstam Khardzhiev keen interest, broke out to her husband, the publishers of the West, though for a decent man is hardly an excuse. But why it was necessary to bring this statement and a series of insults, if the author is positioning itself as the defender of light behalf Khardzhiev?
|
I think that statement is led by just for the fact that it had not been able to use it as a weapon against the memory of Khardzhiev. Like so much else that gives an idea of a living man, with a difficult character, his life has devoted one goal. In this paper different facts turn the side, which helps reflect the views of the author, but shrouded in silence, and he certainly was very emotional and sometimes not quite sure, but at least tries to keep the memory of the good of man, the result of work of which we will never see.
Цитата:
|
From what we write, the offspring will retain most options. I would I choose for him this page. - Jules Renard
|