Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.08.2009, 12:29 Язык оригинала: Русский       #93
Гуру
 
Аватар для Amateur
 
Регистрация: 25.03.2009
Адрес: Россия, СПб
Сообщений: 1,715
Спасибо: 1,838
Поблагодарили 3,879 раз(а) в 698 сообщениях
Репутация: 7406
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Dmitry Посмотреть сообщение
I read the work of Fedorov-Davydov, who described the artist's first on the palette and characteristic strokes of the brush. He believed that, then as an artist puts the brush strokes are very individual and may be a sign of the same attribution as the person's handwriting. It turns out or if it was wrong or whether this level of expertise as it is simply not in the presence of experts from all over-the-art technology capabilities assessment is much more modest than during the Fedorov-Davydov.
Allena is absolutely right. Unfortunately, having only photo unsigned paintings on the forum you can say yes and then not sure just who can not be its author. By the same positive responses, indeed, should be treated only as a reasonable person, not more.

Undoubtedly, the rights and Fedorov-Davydov, but he attributed through his brain, in whose memory deposited thousands of manners of different artists. In order for such a "brain" to make the attribution of modern computer technology, one technique is not enough: we need 100%but to formalize the process of such attribution. But this has not been done. This is impossible without the active cooperation of specialists in the closest of three is not yet related fields of science: art, the collection of "experimental" data, and a branch of mathematics as pattern recognition. So until now everything is almost as in times of Fedorov-Davydov, but, alas, no longer "Fedorov-Davydov, and therefore the possibility of examination modest.



Amateur вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Amateur за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (28.08.2009), LCR (28.08.2009), uriart (31.08.2009), Дмитрий (30.08.2009)