[Дмитрий]

heir, pleased to read your answers on the merits of issues of interest to me. It is interesting that your opinion about the film as worthy of attention coincided with the opinion of some museum workers from Peter. They recognize in it the work of someone from the St. Petersburg academicians landscape. Maybe - it Kuindzhi himself or someone of his students. To check this version offered the same, in my opinion a very good option: put a picture next to the original works Kuindzhi and his disciples in the context of the relevant exhibition. Unfortunately the previous exhibition Kuindzhi I "slept".
What in your opinion, can the difference between Moscow and St. Petersburg school of landscape painting and be the reason that in Moscow, this work is perceived by specialists much worse than in St. Petersburg? This juxtaposition of schools could be felt even in the words of tour guides in art museums that I visited.