Цитата:
Сообщение от Allena
Its material is trustworthy?
|
Allena, how can a credible person, who called the best expert on the works of Malevich today Alexandru Semyonovna Shatskikh somehow "E. Shatskih"?
Generally in the article is inaccurate and absurd, suggesting that the person who wrote it, not familiar with the matter. It seems that the article was written with someone else's words and has to impose a certain conclusion. There are suspicions that the paper is customized ...
Just think, that the use of speculation in the article without the possibility for people who appear in these rumors, to offer its interpret the events, does not permit relates to the publication and its author as a serious investigation.
Quote:
"We firmly know that the archive owned by Khardzhiev and dear to him as life itself, the FSB unceremoniously climbed into private life. This was not invited" duty judge "with the knowledge of the provincial guide, and a connoisseur of the avant-garde, as the author of books about Malevich
E. Shatskih.
All in the narrow world of Russian avant-garde connoisseurs knew what a devastating criticized Khardzhiev book Shatskih, especially the chapter on Malevich. However, you remember, what was the nature of a Khardzhiev? For example, the assessment was too cantankerous. But the mutual hostility. Shatskikh also responded very unflattering and the famous hardzhievskoy editing, and the knowledge of avant-garde.
Three months, day after day, froze the art in the cold basement, without the right to record or disclose the essence of their work. FSB has never officially recognized this expertise and do not disclose the results.
But, I dare to suggest that even of Shatskih security service was unable to obtain the desired output. is becoming increasingly evident that the archive will have to return to the owner. "