[Mark]

Сообщение от Remi

I talked with the owner of one of the "galleries" - he has such a principle - any visitor to something for yourself to find.
In Rostov on Don hang work the same as in the galleries of Stavropol, Krasnodar, Sochi, only the signature on the paintings are different.
Can do now exist gallery that sells art and handicraft products not? And how Galerie nahodyad artists, people who do and do not give "plan."

Dear Remi, point of view, unfairly quoted you the owner of the gallery not only has the right to exist, but in our time is, in my opinion, the only justifiable. This does not apply of course fashion "galleries," laundering "galleries" and "galleries" bought by husbands for wives, to the last "no bullies" on the street. In all recent examples of the gallery itself does not earn for themselves the money to pay the costs tens of thousands of dollars a month. In addition, there is also the target of the gallery. This is usually the formation of collector material, the purchase (for implementation is rarely a good thing to beg a) the paintings etc ... And also - exhibition activities aimed at promoting the collection. All together - it has hundreds of thousands, blurred over time in a little (slowly) in liquid assets and net costs, dollars. Negotiable same means, if these funds are not a "sponsor" purse, simply get nowhere. Replicable painting in high demand much of the population who do not profess a way of life "art for art's sake, but pursued a more pragmatic goal - the decoration of interior. Therefore, replicated painting (seriography posters, etc.) and is the main source of replenishment pocket gallerist, who is always ascetic, and that all available funds are usually invested in quality (with descriptive terms and in terms of liquidity), art. I know the gallery, where most of the space given for consumer goods, including art supplies (brushes, paints, canvases ...), but smaller - a real fount ... And one more thing. When the gallery owner, is spending hard earned and not a "sponsorship" money to buy paintings, then formed his collection (within the same budget) will be many times higher quality than that purchased on other people's money, which is not assumed. In general, the question you asked relates to the category of "eternal" along with the question "Should an artist be rich? Should he write to order? ", Etc. If, however, reject the false pathos, and with the high level of abstraction to move to the high level of not less than the reality, the answer will almost always be positive.