Тема: Reflections
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.08.2009, 14:40 Язык оригинала: Русский       #126
Banned
 
Регистрация: 22.07.2009
Сообщений: 47
Спасибо: 21
Поблагодарили 93 раз(а) в 32 сообщениях
Репутация: 137
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir Посмотреть сообщение
If on the way to the forum to look at the primary site artinvestment.ru (such as articles "Investing in art or in the guide forum), then you will find there are many unbanal information: tips beginners to collectors, information on the exposed forgeries, advice on specific examples of work. All this is available absolutely bezvozmezdo visitors. Almost a year has been free and statistics. I'm sorry if you did not find these times.
In addition there is an important point: access to the database and ratings - is a service that has a fixed price and quality standard. That is, people have any idea what they pay. If it is to standardize and formalize as a paid service unbanal information received by professionals in the course of their activities, the result would be an interesting Pay service. I am sure that subscribers would have found him immediately. In the west is such a thing works quite well (Forbes Collector Newsletter and many others). Why do not you offer the market a paid mailing list? I would have tried it and signed it.
You must not be angry, sir, but the logical thread of your argument desperately torn.
The first part of your promise, in response to the reiteration of homespun truth "if you want, so you and I share, state and itself, the conclusion follows: we shared over the years, but then decided it was better for the money. But at a fixed price and standard quality. (As if the other way.) Keep silent so far about the standard.
Do not save, and links to free information for beginners. After your appeal is to the professionals, but for them these materials is commonplace, the novelty does not shine, simply uninteresting. And how would you not engage samozaklinaniyami - halva, halva! - Sweeter from this mouth will not.
The second part of your message, in fact, disavows your call to share. You acknowledge that all information you have to pay a pro. Good that you understood this.
Now about the standard. Of course, you realize that it is a noun without an adjective absolutely nothing. Standards are low and high, government and industry, European and World, etc. What is your quality standard?
Unfortunately, I can not compare the quality of selling your information with similar products from other vendors. Probably, the criteria for your standard somewhere buried in the depths of your portal. It seems possible once again to share them with readers.



observer вне форума  
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо observer за это полезное сообщение:
NATA NOVA (17.08.2009), Маруся (17.08.2009)