Here are some of the suggested things that seem meaningful to me:
1. The theme "Fight Club" - in the furnace. No one he teaches.
2. Themes of the "Pavilions" do not display in the list of hot topics.
3. Authority to act ruthless. To distinguish the message a candidate for removal is very simple. Criteria: Pursues a message intended to provide participants with additional information about the arts or share their experiences? Not whether the message contains offensive or camouflaged under the controversial remarks about the other participants? That is, not whether the provocative message goals? If the proposed debate, the question of whether the reasoned arguments (protection from flooding)? Appeals and appeals - in the furnace.
If all of this sum, the criterion is - gives a specific message that the party to be useful to other members? If not, what a long time to doubt and create a "reservation" to wit?
A calculated "flood", "pal" or "trolepodobnuyu" work much easier than it seems. And in these cases should not long to doubt, delete stupidity and wit, from the forum not fail. Incidentally, the recent actions of administrators to curb the flood become tougher, which is quite logical.
|