Тема: Artistic rating
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 15.09.2008, 19:54 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Гуру
 
Аватар для SergeiSK
 
Регистрация: 10.08.2008
Адрес: Russia, $ochi
Сообщений: 5,666
Спасибо: 1,397
Поблагодарили 6,209 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 9995
По умолчанию

I am personally very negative attitude to a single artistic rating. And it publish and republish constantly! So this is somebody needs - get over these non-professional edition of money. Generally this rating as a classifier, we must uprazdit and not stick to it no where! And the cost of those of the sponsors he has no effect on prices influence the market and demand. And of course the artistic and social value of the work.
Well that's just from memory:
Sverchkov - 2B
Schilder - 3B
Sychkov - 2B
Albert Benoit - 2B
Burliuk 2A
Rabin - 2A
Svetoslavsky - 3A
And our leading figures:
Nikas - 2B
Tsereteli - 2B
Glazunov - 1B (I think rightly)
Shilov - 1B
Such examples in this book are myriad. Data are from the 10 th issue. I suspect that in the 15th with luminaries already on 1A: D
And where is the real reflection of the merits and sales of artists in this ranking?



SergeiSK вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо SergeiSK за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (16.09.2008), antip (15.09.2008), DSF (15.09.2008), iosif (15.09.2008), Кирилл Сызранский (24.09.2008)