Цитата:
Сообщение от AlexanderG
Kstati, kak tol'ko art, kartina poiavliaetsia na rynke, ona stanovitsia tovarom. U vseh tovarno-deneznyh otnoshenii odna shema. Mozno iulit 'i nazyvat' po-raznomu, chto suti ne meniaet.
|
I agree with you, and in general it is high time to consider the market as the new reality of being, and not something on the other side thereof. It's not very nice, especially for artists, but it must be taken and then the market will not be as terrible as not afraid of bad weather. Interestingly, the art market in Australia is thriving, or just there?
[color="# 666686"]Posted 22 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
Why? As a "test Dali, the artist should be able to draw a horse? I'm here, for example, LinkBacks sincerely, if Hirst knows how to draw a horse. Although almost sure can. And not be able - to buy the carcass and deceiving marker I, for instance, recently tried to handle the statement write (by hand) - tortured, unlearned. That's not to say that I do not know how to write?
|
Hearst certainly knows how to draw, but the problem in another, far more complex - namely, to break out beyond the old skills, then get something new. This is the essence, and to spend time on something you no longer need hardly reasonable.
[color="# 666686"]Added after 55 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от iosif
This third reason can call (justifying the greedy miser-dealer): who ventured, and drinking champagne. The artist is not at risk - still the promoting of his name, not a dealer. For the artist, therefore, can not be a commercial failure.
|
If the dealer will be able to not consider the well-known artist (untwist) the star, it's brilliant dealer. But where he can see the great unknown? They are not known, they nowhere in the near field there. That and you have to untwist, that arm will fall. Do not you?