Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.08.2009, 15:52 Язык оригинала: Русский       #46
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir Посмотреть сообщение
Gregory:

Yes, Moscow is full of dirt - it is not the cleanest city. But in the center of mud like no, as I have seen in some European capitals. It should be noted that since the late 1980's and early 90's, Moscow has become much cleaner.

Veronique:

Surprised that you can not take pictures in the Tretyakov Gallery. Perhaps not with flash or need to buy a separate ticket?

That's one of the unfortunate photo, which I did in the Pushkin Museum in the dozens. In the eyes of the watchmen. I liked the combination of object and its shadow - but failed to capture well. "Porter" stood by and saw that I was on them koshus, said: "Shoot, shoot, only without the flash!"

By the way, the condition not to take photographs in the exhibition Turner might well be nominated as the Tate Gallery. But there you could buy a great album about Turner's only 900 rubles. I hope not to miss?
On the outskirts of mud either. Water is not poured into the streets. If you take the peripherals there ranesohranyavshiesya areas bring to the state of the ruins intentionally. In the south of France, centers of cities are given to the Arabs and there is a mess and the French are building houses for the benefit of the city-near. In urban areas only facades freshly painted and inside -7 floor without elevator.
The Tretyakov photos probably are not allowed to buy albums.



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием