View Single Post
Old 12-09-2008, 22:50 Original language: Russian        #7
Гуру
 
Vladimir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,085
Thanks: 3,353
Thanked 25,444 Times in 5,540 Posts
Reputation: 23525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamila View Post
"One of the claims made in the lawsuit, was the fact that" at the entrance to the exhibition hall, there were no restrictions on age, and the Center for Contemporary Art visit families with children. "
not so. restrictions on age attended (attach photo),
Such claims are often composed of distortions. Calculation of the fact that the defendant began to make excuses. And there is the proverb goes: whether he stole a hat, whether he had his hat stolen. I do not believe in righteous anger like going to the children's party, and here "pornography". Next, probably on the order of Sotheby's for the publication of reproductions of some chistovskogo. And Courbet good. And metaphorical



Vladimir is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vladimir For This Useful Post:
dedulya37 (13-09-2008), LCR (12-09-2008), Евгений (13-09-2008)