Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
The discussion was around this:
Quote:
Цитата:
Originally Posted by Chernomashentsev Vladimir View Post
And it can not distinguish from non-Socialist Realism Socialist Realism. The fact that it was drawn in the Soviet era and Soviet socialist realism, does everything in the world! Again, I'm not quite right! Chance of more socialist realism socialist camp.
What will happen after 100 years Like this? That's when art historians will puzzle over definitions, if you are already youth is mistaken.
|
Completely agree! (especially about Deineko!) But the question that was about something else!
(probably not keep track of the context, here again, and it came out "Burime" is when you see the last line, and zatsiklivaeschsya on it) |
Listen, you wrote: "the realism of the 20 th century, almost automatically be read as socialist realism." Then you nuanced as follows: "The realism of the 20 th century, almost automatically will read the art of Totalitarianism. I strongly disagree with either the first or the second option and tried to explain why, citing the short list of the biggest, in my view, the realist artists of the twentieth century, in no way associated with socialist realism, and immeasurably more important than Socialist Realism.
I am convinced that after 100 years of Socialist Realism will be given as much attention as is now being given ofialnomu art III Reich, or Mussolini's Italy. At the same time real identity - whether or Dejneka Severini - will continue to cause admiration.
Whereupon leaving the scene, as more to say on this story I have absolutely nothing.