Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 05.08.2009, 03:21 Язык оригинала: Русский       #13
Гуру
 
Аватар для K-Maler
 
Регистрация: 02.02.2009
Сообщений: 4,636
Спасибо: 9,580
Поблагодарили 3,695 раз(а) в 1,704 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 6503
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir Посмотреть сообщение
news on the site, "Why work of women artists is much cheaper than works created by men?" (http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...n_artists.html) - I'm sure many thought on this subject. Agrumentatsiya individual specialists (such as no major artists at all or most of the "fuse" after the birth of children) are not satisfied, "Darwinism" of some kind. But there are statistics, indeed male artists succeed more and more often in the history of art. Why? There are versions?
Read as a U.S. study of women's careers, statistics and pr.U have happened, that women after all, that is success. Due to natural causes (family, children). Or love. Ie women love does not work, among other things, like men, ie, among other important matters. Physically, everything is not so psychologically. And in the course of world affairs run by men. In earlier times, life and life were such that a woman could not be much, but when it was possible, it is quite at the level of "example - Vigee-Lebrun, the daughter of the artist. Today, the problems are the same, but features much more. But there is a bias and a lot of "psychological" brake. Appearance in this case is of great importance, and in both cases (beautiful and ugly) can suddenly become a brake ...



K-Maler вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо K-Maler за это полезное сообщение:
NATA NOVA (05.08.2009), Вивьен (05.08.2009), раскатов (05.08.2009), таша (05.08.2009)