All greetings! (Time difference NW hours from us)
About Lempicka. I do not think it is boorish and possibly. "spornoym vision.
(Madame Dali, too, in this company, which bought the expensive perfume instead of food for the child and kolaboratsionistka Chanel, which the fascists ........ "duzhila" (Even though their contribution to the world's cultural heritage) .. Here is a my NEGLAMURNY view (sorry, I have the right!)
"Suchizm" - (very often) the reverse side of glamor.(IMNO)
About Vasiliev. The book is magnificent. As an artist I do not know. Behaves unworthily. (IMHO)
Neckties. 1. îôôòîï, 2.Kitcha not as such. (so many times I expressed my point of view But good things in them (tie) - that no one wear them not zastavlyaet.Evgeny, thanks for the mention (in fact you do not think that's true ?) aolbom open to friends, the rest can be "vyguglit.
(theme "glamor in the art of" little hands HH (ITS) has become a kitsch-topic discussion infinite and deeply philosophical (IMHO)
"YOU" and "YOU" - see my profile. I respect these rules extremely difficult (especially compared to the permanent zadirok, reciprocal injections every psychological bites in the form of implications in almost 50%of posts) and where can I find out more, I do not quite understand. "(Here there is a" mental dissonance. ") Each person responsible for the style that expresses itself and quite estesstvenno if "heterogeneity" will not be able to integrate, it is quite normal that it will be torn. No problem. It's a very "natural."
It seems that all .. Dissatisfied ask (bravely) expressed lichku
All thanks.
[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 hours and 20 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Admin
Member NATA NOVA bear a warning about the inadmissibility of such statements at the forum. In addition, the urge to communicate with other participants politely and "you". In the case of a repetition of such scandalous and provocative statements, your account will be blocked.
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
Quote:
Note from NATA NOVA
And for me so de Lempicka-glamorous ...
NATA NOVA, no Do not be rude ........
__________________
Eugene
Last edited by Eugene; Today at 09:06.
|
That's Google "bitch" in and declined as well. Izvinete friends, but "suchek" at least a dime a dozen, including in and glamorous. "Personally, I absolutely could not hurt anyone (in principle) .. , and boorishness (must be "rudeness" now poguglit) do not watch .. admit that a few decades ago it was "unprintable", but this attitude is outdated ... "Bitch, it is useful words now (as shown by my research) may be wrong sites looked-so let the right ..
and what is "account" have no idea.
and if not difficult, it is possible examples (mine) 1) impolite and 2) provocation?
And the fact without proof as that ..
Thank you.
As for the "YOU-YOU", it is possible without the direct speech to do if Admin insists on a formal communication (although again, it amuses ME) may be because in the third person to communicate .. As admin thinks? even to old friends. Can Porobovati right before. (direct speech I do not overpower, even crack!)
------- End of official part ---
As for the topic "glamor in the art." I advise you to have a separate Veronica: "artist Alexander Braginsky."
And to complement this way: "Glamor and kitsch in art", because "de facto" she conform to this title ..
be better, I think so ..
I wanted to say on the works, but among all this "rubbish" I consider it inappropriate and completely "neglamurnym" ...