Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
It looks like a mistake. Not violent. But so true to the old wisdom of "Still Waters Run Deep - run deep".
|
I have a speculation on this subject, that is, the version is not supported by any evidence
There is a commercial logic, the market. Many people like Picasso, "Portrait of Dora Maar." Hundreds of thousands. But to afford a Picasso might well several thousand people (for this to be a millionaire, a multimillionaire), and want to - well, hundreds of power. Portraits of such class cost tens of millions of dollars and each sale - the event. To meet the market demand arises in some way work-substitutes. Know the name of a similar idea more reasonable price. In the case of Kondo obtained: the famous name (Condo is very well known painter) pikasinaya issue price in the tens of thousands of dollars, not millions. During a hundred times more than a reproduction of Picasso. The same logic can be placed on creativity Wick Myunisa. Remember the "Russian project"? Were taken from the work of Rodchenko to Vereshchagin and, based on the unique author's method made Photocomposition enormous size. That is, the buyer mozhnet buy Rodchenko made by the famous artist Vik Myunisa. And I think it's great, why not? Reproach of plagiarism is not wealthy. The ideas of Russian avant-garde used by many. If you can Infante, why nelyazya Myunisu. I saw the work Myunisa alive (found in the archive's) and I will say this: inspired!