Тема: Glamor in the art
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 30.07.2009, 14:05 Язык оригинала: Русский       #19
Banned
 
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,381 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2191
По умолчанию

Of course, better to be famous and rich. Dead artist - do not care. But we do not care.
Argue here is useless. Some people and elephants - a rarity. And for me - was kitsch, kitsch, and so remained.
His jewelry - art and rarity, I do not call and do not hang on the wall. A Klimt * - hanged. He looks good in modern interiors, if made in China with gilt foil. Better than in reproduction. If it is still in the golden frame to frame - then it ceases to be glamorous and transformed into kitsch.

* I am not in the form of the Klimt, that in a museum nowadays.


Perhaps not venture more embed their ideas about glamor. I hope my departure from the theme does not force you to spend on my place.

  I'm going to enjoy Ionova and Khachatrian peer.



Черномашенцев Владимир вне форума   Ответить с цитированием