Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 26.07.2009, 15:38 Язык оригинала: Русский       #93
Гуру
 
Аватар для NATA NOVA
 
Регистрация: 23.07.2009
Сообщений: 5,736
Спасибо: 8,058
Поблагодарили 4,382 раз(а) в 2,259 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 8507
Отправить сообщение для NATA NOVA с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
in his time entirely ineligible in the Soviet Union which had a monopoly on the art, can not come to terms with the loss of this monopoly and trying to prevent another part of the Russian artists access to museums, using their usual method of denunciations and insinuations. Is now clear?
Yes, my naive mind is clear now (thanks for razyasnenie)
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
Only Russian art.
And the second: the conversation is about modern art, which is no longer collected Tretyakov, Sc. Department of Arts of the twentieth century, it is not even in Lavrushensky, but in another building, and at another address.
Then, if separately, Th worry about it?. I Glowno, What's the matter "obanyyv" alone was ...

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
The theme of the people, perhaps, should be set aside: science, also funded by national (fiscal) means, does not develop a "people", and its individual representatives, have this ability and have received appropriate education. Why do you want to in the art of the situation was different?
Sadly all this ... (going to write!)



NATA NOVA вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо NATA NOVA за это полезное сообщение:
Тютчев (26.07.2009)