Цитата:
Сообщение от eva777
Rich people know how to count money, and if they have earned them, they certainly are not idiots and fools. This is a misconception to believe that someone that they can deceive. Even if they are not collectors, and collectors, they are just with their money does not melt.
|
The fact that the rich - are not fools, we take as an axiom. The second axiom: with the money they are extremely reluctant to part (see, for example, the story of Abramovich, who ordered an obscure Italian handyman to make for him "Warhol", not wanting to lay oneself out to the original). But do not, I believe, hasty to conclude from this that they can not cheat.
Not every ochen-bogatyy-chelovek/ochen-umnyy-chelovek ready to devote time (a lot of time!) Detailed study of the arts to make their own choices, with knowledge of the case. In fact, in most cases ochen-bogatyy-chelovek/ochen-umnyy-chelovek chooses not to purchase the object, and an expert on them (stock exchange, a specialist in real estate, art). And then another question arises: is it possible to deceive menee-bogatogo-cheloveka/menee-umnogo-cheloveka ie expert? Numerous scandals associated with successful deception and machinations prove that you can fool the expert without problems
All vyshekazannoe absolutely not applicable to Rothko (which, I repeat, I appreciate very much). Rather, it is a requiem for the rich anonymous collectors (or collector): someone who was famous for buying Krasnopevtsev over 1 million - to be honest, I do not remember whether the pounds, euros or dollars, but that is all the same - or someone who bought questionable naked girls Deineki (questionable, not because of naked, but because they were obviously stripped clumsy hand), hotly debated at this forum.
In short: ochen-bogatyh/ochen-umnyh relatively long, and infallible, according to rumors, one of Dad