For all the seemingly formal differences, "aktualschiki" united in one thing: they think it possible to declare a "fine art" anything: any object, remake, action ( "action") and photos of "shares", video, computer file, and finally, the complete absence of anything (empty album pages, etc.) The product as such, does not matter - it is important to verbal interpretation, "mesedzh (message), which the artist himself or his speech-writer "- the art place! viewer. Young avtorsha presented at the Moscow "Biennale" Velcro from adhering to them dead flies. Well-known radio commentator Yakov Krotov declared this "project" a symbol of impermanence vsegs world, equal to the wisdom of Ecclesiastes.
"Mesedzh" substitute for the product - that his verbal explanation, perception, sensation - the ideologists of "modern art" proclaim the modern art, though completely removes and replaces paintings, graphics, sculpture. "Traditional" art, that is, in fact, they contemptuously art enroll in "marginal", "outdated," write off "the ship of modernity" as not worthy of any exhibition in the museum's Department of Modern Art, no broad funding, no representation at international biennials.
"Actual art and fine art in fact, completely different types of activities requiring different orientation of the mind and, consequently, different forms of learning. It is obvious that "contemporary art" does not need such qualities as talent, vocation, the human capacity for artistic creativity. You do not need any professional skill, and, respectively, and the professional art education. So no need to spend years mastering the figure painting, perspective, anatomy, technology, etc. - should be developed in a very different quality: the ability to think up something "stunning", something that even before the "me" no one tried to think and interested in their "project" curators "image makers" that it "will announce the art" sponsors who will fund it, managers, auctioneers, which drive up its sales price. This way offend the opportunity to break into the world art market, to gain world fame. Which young artist does not want to pass for new, modern, good! The danger is that the artist is completely dependent on supervisors, managers, art historians: it can be added to the list of "topical", "roll out" and sell for big money, but may in fact and delete "from the list, which means for Artist total catastrophe. End. Nothingness. Velcro with dead flies, if the "ideologues" do not declare their "art", not proclaim the "impermanence of all earthly things, equal to the wisdom of Ecclesiastes," and are just Velcro from railway station buffet, filth, which, used, thrown in the trash. That will happen and the project author »..."
Full article here:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/blog.php?b=575
------------------------------------------------
Maria Chegodaeva
Born 19.01.1931 in Moscow.
Lives and works in Moscow.
Art historian and art critic. In 1956 she graduated from Moscow State Art Institute. VISurikova.
Author of books on contemporary artists: "Vladimir Minaev" (Moscow, 1975), "Benjamin Basov (Moscow, 1983)," Book Arts of the USSR "in 2 vols (Moscow, 1983)," Ways and outcomes " (Moscow, 1989), "Kitsch, kitsch, kitsch" (Moscow, 1990), "Alexei Shmarinov" (Moscow, 1992), "Art, which was" (Moscow, 1997), "Dementiy A. Shmarinov" (Moscow, 1997), "Gregory Benetsionovich Inger. My Childhood" (Moscow, 1997).
Corresponding Member of the Russia Academy of Arts (1997). Candidate of Art (1986).
Member of the Russia Academy of Arts (2001).
Member of the Presidium of the Russia Academy of Arts (2005).
Doctor of Art (2005).
http://www.rah.ru/content/ru/main_me...12-11-22-17-18