Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.05.2008, 10:59 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,447 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23528
По умолчанию

Sergeyitch, Picasso - a bad example, he basically can not grow as fast as the "venture" artists, favorites emerging market. Picasso is unlikely to buy for speculative purposes, at best maintain or slightly increase. And for the sake of prestige. Considerably faster than the market he is unlikely to grow. "Fire", ie a sharp rise in price considerably faster than the market can only things that contain risks and therefore undervalued. I'm not talking about the risks of origin (authenticity), but about the risks of recognition, market career. If you guess an artist, you can expect "a shot." Among the sixties still have such. Among modern art have names, but there are too high risks. Among the antique vystrelevshih artists can recall the German and Austrian ekspressonistov - some pictures can be seen at the Salon now in the arena.



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием