Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 23.07.2009, 12:37 Язык оригинала: Русский       #65
Banned
 
Регистрация: 11.07.2009
Сообщений: 1,789
Спасибо: 852
Поблагодарили 1,805 раз(а) в 972 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 23
Репутация: 3342
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Jasmin Посмотреть сообщение
The mere posing of the question - nonsense! The artist must be able to paint at all times, and the modern (today), and in the past, and in the future ...
You are not exact. Imagine that painting is not figurative. In the abstractions need to feel the rhythm of the spots, the rhythm of color, know that such a formal composition. Well you can without drawing directly on the canvas to apply the color stain. There is also a primitive or painting a picture where the child simply revel in the free movement of hands without there knowledge of anatomy. There is also a painting where the first is just an idea, the rest is secondary. And now after age ideas.
But traditionalists, I must say, too zaigryvatsya academic drawing and paste-like bold professional so that the smear technique becomes an end in itself. And what is written or drawn matter. The main thing that a bold stroke or a beautifully superimposed strokes. So stamped lilac, cornflower, head sitters, roofs, trees, clouds, meadows, fields and so on. and TP ..



Posav вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Posav за это полезное сообщение:
таша (23.07.2009)