Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
I wonder: why in the 16 th century artists did not write it as in the 15 th, 17 th, not as in the 16 th, 19 th, not as in the 18 th, finally , 20 th, not as a 19-m (talking about Western European art, of course, as in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet), and artists, whose products are shown in this plot, without asking existential questions, repeat " achieve "painting the mid-19 th century, where the quality of determined similarity. Is it not strange?
|
Interestingly, both written ... Because significant artists did not follow fashion (as you propose), and his feelings. And they are known, not laid himself. The emergence of new trends, of course, enriched the art, but ... to distinguish from today (you can even take most of the twentieth century), the issue was not raised on professinalizme (crafts). It was self razumeischeesya. Today bred clumsy, guised fashionable and incompetent - so I see. This Korovin could say about Vrubel that "he sees not as we are." But he Vrubel itself would not allow such ...
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet
|
You know Russia or bad, or do not like it ... Silver Age! - I hope it to you about something said.