17.07.2009, 09:44
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#49
|
Старожил
Регистрация: 20.09.2008
Адрес: Moscow,Russia
Сообщений: 694
Спасибо: 1,324
Поблагодарили 1,086 раз(а) в 255 сообщениях
Репутация: 2082
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
I wonder: why in the 16 th century artists did not write it as in the 15 th, 17 th, not as in the 16 th, 19 th, not as in the 18 th, finally , 20 th, not as a 19-m (talking about Western European art, of course, as in Russia, secular painting in those days was not yet), and artists, whose products are shown in this plot, without asking existential questions, repeat " achieve "painting the mid-19 th century, where the quality of determined similarity. Is not it strange?
|
The development of any culture, civilization has always been accompanied by growth and-upadkom.Kak in the culture of ancient Egipta.Ili, the entire ancient culture, cradle of tsivilizatsii.Tak that the current development of the arts, may well be his demise.
|
|
|