Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 05.09.2008, 16:18 Язык оригинала: Русский       #63
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,449 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23530
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37 Посмотреть сообщение
This is the most important thing and people should understand. The works are monitored and all the less they walk in a circle, and those that are "correct" should be marked with a special label. That is the essence of the dispute between supporters and opponents of the disclosure of all the nuances of determining the authenticity of works by the artist.
About labeling idea is correct. About this, I remember, wrote Denis E. Lukashin of Artkonsaltinga. He recalls that in Russia it is time to introduce the practice of Certificates of the author. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...???# post13265
The documents (nor, probably, technical labels), confirming the authorship and issued by the authors themselves. Ideal solution. And then do not need to be suspended or "record Krasnopvtseva, no evidence of relatives or heap expertise and opinions. And abandoned Glazunov, too, will not. The author has made the work, gave her documents to remove all doubt. I think that this will come.



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием