Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 04.09.2008, 11:11 Язык оригинала: Русский       #54
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw Посмотреть сообщение
1. You have a legal dispute, it must be brought to court. Also, you can sue the auction, which is logical, but there is nothing, probably not comes off. As you write, actually stole them , probably, to prove that you can not. Therefore - as will be ...
It could be supposed that the auction suggests that if you do not decide the issue in court, you can not prove their claims. Based on the presumption of innocence, he can not suspect deliverer works. Do not return to work to the owner they can not, there is no reason. They contract under which they operate. Retaining the work they receive a lawsuit, which instantly lose, that auction is not completely necessary. Your letter - nothing. To maintain the picture they could only based on the overlay tries to prohibit the court. You need to be initsirovat trial, at the time onogo pictures would have been arrested.
Letter to you, most likely, does not contain anything legally binding, as is common courtesy, because you have the attitude to these works, and should not spoil relations.
You know, if I could not prove, I would just did not go to the auction house. The evidence I have, now I can not speak about them, because this whole story is not over yet, tell you later.

I wrote "in fact stolen," because there is a difference between "steal" and "assign". Let's just say: the paintings were received for temporary storage, but instead return them by using the fact that the artist is dead, they are trying to pass off as their own - very banal situation, but this case - only when I can prove something.

Apply to the court prior to the sale we have not had time because the court is competent to the residence of the defendant (the auction house, as already mentioned - in England, the defendant - in another European country, I myself - in the third). My lawyer - to which I have absolutely no complaints - the auction house sent a lawyer arguments and written evidence, which he agreed and promised in writing that the work will be delayed pending resolution of the case. Before we give the work the auction house changed its legal counsel.

Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw Посмотреть сообщение
2. Court. Man again not easy to get away.
Many of my friends hudonikov now suing. But the court takes time and money - a lot of time and a lot of money - and for what result? In the case we are again forced to give foundry castings 1.2, and then resumes ...



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
Маруся (02.02.2015)