Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
So after all fund Chagall, now goes just as well.
If you give them work on the attribution, then option two:
Or recognize the true, or destroy.
|
Not exactly, or rather not so
.
Like any artist, Chagall was emotional. And among other things mean and loved money, and his wife loved him very much (money).
Fund Chagall organizations get enough money for the certificates, publication of works, commissions on sales, etc. They have no interest (like Chagall - not like it and not mine) in the rejection of the author's works. They have another problem - how to deal with any fraud and forgery
.
Heard such a story. Asked to confirm the earlier work. Onaya very similar to the present. But there are some doubts. Type of Vitebsk. Checked the terrain, could not be drawn (and Chagall particularly topographically not invent). Ah, said the fund, then all converges! What converges? Besides the problems with painting, topography, the provenance appears that Chagall gave this painting to Mr. H., and Chagall never did anyone any pictures not gave
Well, in the TG is a pair of fake Chagall works with these signatures thereof.