[fross]

Сообщение от Munch

Here, even judging by this interview Molodkina. He spoke mainly about the formal methods ( "negative" sculpture, "projection"). And the meaning is extracted Tupitsin, raising parallels with Rothko, and Chaim Soutine, and with Jeff Koons, and even with Adorno. Ie they are trying, I think, to ennoble politically sensitive works Molodkina, because he gives a unique interpretation - a political one. Ie as if to disguise his candid konyukturnost cultural meaning. No one noticed? Is it from this, we lose? And he does not refute Molodkin Tupitsina not send them to hell with their associations. He likes what they say. Of course, we can all their cultural explanations aside and say: "The Artist Molodkin operates solely political theme, and it belongs (or is creating) voznikschuyu in the contemporary art trend aesthetization policies. The truth in art is very subjective ....

But from a marketing standpoint, his strategy is flawless. Capturing the semantic category of oil and Russia, the same as twenty years ago, the USSR Reconstruction - of course export commodity. Attempts to give this meaning as in the parable about the Talmud, Socrates and two in the chimney:

This whole issue - nonsense, and if you spend a life, responding to pointless questions, then all your answers, too, will be meaningless!