Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 07.07.2009, 00:28 Язык оригинала: Русский       #25
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,449 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23530
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Munch Посмотреть сообщение
I actually important to be able to see projects Biennale eyes on the screen as if live. Are all have the opportunity to go ..
Event openly export, but then what can and will bring. They brought the same to us when something from another show Mukhina's sculpture.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Munch Посмотреть сообщение
but on the other - the text Khachaturova.
Yes, the emotional critic. This not only writes well, but spoke passionately (that is not often a combination). To my taste, however, often overpraise Trust
Цитата:
Сообщение от Munch Посмотреть сообщение
Comrades, but it is "context" and "discourse" and enter a work of art in culture, as mentioned Konchalovsky (You yourself, Fross, placed his interview). Poironizirovat of art history texts and povstavlyat studs are not forbidden, if only this irony is not degenerated into nagging and does not suffer total nonpositive discourse.
A little artists themselves complicated things pokommentirovat? What we have them all to a man removed from the madding crowd? All in constant search for meaning? Unlike. Previously, once the innovators did not hesitate to take up the pen: and explained and monographs published. And now we often get second or third interpretation. For a devastating division of labor: the subject put the curators, the works funded by industry groups, noses mop PR, explaining that generates criticism. As a result, instead of pure product mix, we obtain: instead of waiting for us steak burger (may not be bad), in which what is not only a mixture. And how it left the meat and some of the cooks rasstaralsya stronger? With whose version in the end the audience is concerned? Noticed that even the interviews of artists today have become a rarity? Why would it?

No nagging could not have done But, honestly, not malice.

Added after 44 minutes
[QUOTE="Munch, 457595]Author dissatisfied (YP who is this?), Which is about the artists who represent Russia in the main draft Birnbaum hardly speak, but the draft of the national pavilion is stuck, with the exalted role of PR[/QUOTE]
Yuri Plastinin

[size="1"]Posted 50 minutes[/size]
Цитата:
Сообщение от gans Посмотреть сообщение
And this just strange. "Creative" or something?: D Some greetings from the past.
Fresh interviews with Molodkin in Art Chronicle: http://artchronika.ru/item.asp?id=1640



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
Евгений (07.07.2009), Мунк (07.07.2009)