Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.07.2009, 12:26 Язык оригинала: Русский       #18
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Munch Посмотреть сообщение
Here's an interesting view of how we presented the Motherland Russia's participation in the Venice Biennale. Author dissatisfied (YP who is this?), Which is about the artists who represent Russia in the main draft Birnbaum hardly speak, but the draft of the national pavilion is stuck, with the exalted role of PR - that is, as if on its merit and worth talking about, not about the artistic value of the exposure. http://www.artinfo.ru/ru/news/main/b...-53_venice.htm
I read. Once again, I wonder why these questions and contradictions are always opened to the fact, when the train left? Why such Liability parties not to hold a round table for four months before the show? Make some imitation transparent regime in the style of public hearings. It is clear that decisions must be made at the expert level (otherwise "shook" any question), but at least let each other agree in advance.



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием