Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 16.06.2009, 11:32 Язык оригинала: Русский       #6
Гуру
 
Аватар для dedulya37
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2008
Сообщений: 5,017
Спасибо: 5,605
Поблагодарили 6,167 раз(а) в 1,669 сообщениях
Репутация: 9525
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от vyadem Посмотреть сообщение
so it will be easier to look
It's all very subtle.
If I, say, with the maximum precision can tell a fake job or not, I can not say that trabota stolen, until I submit the evidence. And not caught, as you know, not a thief.
I went to, for example, in one gallery and tell the staff that work stolen.
Here one should call up, the "up" calls is even higher and as a result I have been informed that the work was bought at Izmailovo collapse.
How do I prove that it is not so??
Nobody would believe that there is a psycho who keeps track of all the work of the artist.
On the other hand, have you noticed that the dynamics of fakes on Stozharov slowed down? Obviously, this is the result of our discussions with you (Tell me, genius: D)
Concludes: an ambiguous work should speak out loud, and then the war will maneuver.
He took off after work Tyukhtin Vukolova auction after the last statement that the work is stolen! Who wants to spoil the reputation?



dedulya37 вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 7 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо dedulya37 за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (16.06.2009), Glasha (16.06.2009), LCR (19.06.2009), usynin2 (25.11.2009), vyadem (16.06.2009), v_r (16.06.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (16.06.2009)