Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.06.2009, 23:09 Язык оригинала: Русский       #46
Гуру
 
Аватар для Yaya
 
Регистрация: 29.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 1,514
Спасибо: 891
Поблагодарили 1,308 раз(а) в 415 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 7048
По умолчанию

vyadem, the brilliant writer, Nabokov considered genius writer Dostoevsky Balbes. Thus, Dostoevsky, for obvious reasons did not even suspect the existence of a severe attack. Nevertheless, they both objectively brilliant writer, if only because that their genius is recognized throughout the civilized (and not so) world. not to mention other "indicators".
What I want to say? There are objective criteria for assessing genius hud.proizv. Especially when there is a historical retrospective. And the subjective opinion of it has nothing to do. Just as not relevant to the genius of Dostoevsky's view of him tov.Nabokova.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Altim, we live in an age of globalization. the era of nation-states is over. is part of the modern phyla. discourse. You probably know about it? ..



Yaya вне форума   Ответить с цитированием