[Pavel]

Сообщение от Altim

Need a strong positive dynamics of GDP and a high index of consumer sentiment, which corresponds to finding the economy as "growth" phase of the economic cycle. Painting relates to goods excess demand, ie such are not part of a set of basic household needs, thus the demand for it (painting) differs sharply procyclical character - namely, the cost of painting units and sales of beautiful goods falling off sharply after the main macroeconomic indicators, and often faster than their lower .
Everything Else - subjectively.

I think the arts are not dependent, and suffer from economic factors. The history of French art, and our before and after the revolutionary development shows that even in the most difficult times, art has developed, and sometimes through, and contrary. I think that point is not that people can not buy, but the fact that they can not sell for a price. This can be done through the auction and the wider the market the greater the supply and higher prices. Further benefits include factor-collectors gather the collection for years denying themselves in many ways, but the heirs to divide the collection often try to turn it into money. When these things are getting any cheaper to acquire its value, but only if the sale is open. And not from under the counter and without fraudulent tricks. At different times of the artist are different conditions and paintings fall into different hands sometimes vain. When price increases, all these works appear, and x is literally saves trade. Pictures can and should fall into the hands of the broadest range of people and I think the wider the better for the artist. Somewhere If someone gets a podvolovki picture and get it at an auction for a round sum of all will know by this artist. So it was with Sezen.
I like your avatar, good job.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Buscador

U nih byla gruppa hudoznikov, vydelennaia imi samimi, kotorye schitalis' veduschimi.

Manet poluchil prisnanie blagodaria svoemu shkol'nomu drugu Antoninu Proustu, kotoryi stal ministrom kul'tury v 1881 godu i podderzal 'koresha'.
Podderzal do takoi stepeni, chto daze orden pochiotnogo legiona vydal.

It deserves in the opinion of the Impressionists and history.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Buscador

You did not ask me the name of the artist, and asked to evaluate the work. And such nonsense, I am not engaged. This is the first. Secondly - you as a connoisseur of French Impressionists and the French language would need to know that the name was Edouard Manet. And the third - the impressionists did not, and there could be neither a "chapter". This is not the Provisional Government ...

You should read more, it is very interesting. The name means Manet masterpiece, it means tens of millions, it is natural.
Imitation and the study is two different things. Malevich most brilliant artist, look Suprematists work at his institute. This is the way to the brightness, the construction and tonal color. If you understand this, you will reach togozhe result without imitation.