Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
And in the article asserts that Lavrushensky much more than in the Crimean Val.
|
At the expense of schoolchildren, with field trips, etc.
In Crimea, many still do not go, they just do not know that the CHA has the State Tretyakov Gallery and The Art of the twentieth century.
And in the old and the name of art. Metro will.
The Crimean interesting, there is a lot of hang of what was not.
Very interesting Bogorodsky, Vyalov, early Pimenov, Deineka, of course, but Safronov, G. Rublev, Ribchenko, Semashkevich, M. Sokolov, of the Andes. Goncharov, Falk many "new" hanged. Very interesting: Dormidontov, Shchipitsyn, Isupov, Kozlov, Mavrina, Luchishkin ...
"Severe style" well represented.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 12 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
|
However, Kandinsky, Filonov, Chagall represented sparingly (although the collection allow wider), and some of their outstanding work almost drowned in the chaotic hanging.
|
Yes, very little.
5 works Filonov (3 /m, 2-boom. /M, of which one is not hanging on a piece of paper it is written, "the exhibition;
2 works by Kandinsky and only one-step-"Above the town.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 17 minutes later[/color]
Цитата:
|
The viewer can easily imagine that after the legendary "Red Horse" 1912 KS Petrov-Vodkin simply died, for his late great things we do not see.
|
Wonder what?
What is in the State Tretyakov Gallery of "big things he later"?
That's not like this "shadow on the fence", blah blah blah is ...
You Come to the store, see what there is of Petrov-Vodkin "large, late", and compared to that on the walls and then against the "scrap will not be receiving ... : D: D: D