Цитата:
Сообщение от Samvel
But seriously, I really think Otroshchenko, much more serious artist than Stolyarenko P and O Zakharov.
|
From this assessment does not agree. On Otroshchenko you can judge is competent, because a holder of its artistic heritage and thoroughly good look at him. And about Stolyarenko and Zakharov judge on the Internet and the fragments of their work, which fall on the auction sales, etc. Stolyarenko albums you seen? Look, just in case. Those cabin things that the artist after the collapse of the Soviet Union was compelled to write to feed - this is an insignificant drop in the ocean of his work.
Here is an example of what not to know the artist and judge it by auction.
We have a Sergei Alekseevich Grigoriev (1910-1988). If you look at a selection of his works in the history of the auction "Four Corners" and not be bothered trekking to the Tretyakov Gallery or NHMU, then it never comes, that is - People's Artist of USSR, academician of USSR Academy of Arts, twice winner of the Stalin Prize, the winner of three medals, a professor and rector of the Kiev State Art Institute, and simply the best genre painter of the Soviet Ukraine. See, this is what can be called indicative of the maestro's work?
http://www.korners.com.ua/russian/painters/245
So with Zakharov, and with Stolyarenko, and most other prominent Soviet Ukrainian painters. Art Market - this is not the place to form an opinion about the artist.