[mezon]

Continuing the theme of the relationship of physics and art was revealed to me more depth of their relationship. I hope it will also help you in understanding the interaction of classical, contemporary art and people.

Читать дальше... 

«Most philosophers of science recognize that any explanation of modern science, particularly physics, is a separate phenomenon can not be absolutely true, because it can not be unambiguous. Absolutely true, it would be description of the phenomenon through a unified theory of all reality, but as to create such a theory, apparently, can not, any description of physical phenomena will remain only possible (and so can explain), acceptable, like truth, suitable for our purposes, calculations, etc. In Greek, all these definitions can be expressed in one word eikos. And then can not remember that Plato described in the "Timaeus" its arguments about the sensually perceived, that is, in fact physics, eikos logos.
Interestingly, in mathematics this is the case, apparently, quite different. There is no need to seek a unified theory of mathematical objects to using it for the first time to see the triangle in its true light. Suppose that Euclidean geometry is only a special case of a more general geometry - all the same sum of the angles of a plane triangle will equal 180 °, as well as do not change, and other properties of plane figures.
How would physics has not tried it, says Plato, can not go beyond the credibility and reach the truth, because it reveals eikos on things that exist in the way eikones - similarities. "Talk eikos" means to speak through the likes of, to create images (icons), as do artists and poets. In the understanding of Plato, physics approaches rather with art than with science (mathematics). In contrast to science, the thing intelligible, like the art of studying the physics of the sensual world. But the sensually perceived not know it can be represented or, at best, create. The artist, says Plato in the "State", depicts not the idea of a bed, a bed, made a craftsman. The same way a physicist describes not intelligible cosmos, and his visible incarnation, created by the demiurge. Therefore, the arguments physics, as well as pictures of the artist, the essence of "similarity of similarities" and "shadows of shadows", situated on the "third place on the essence, ... from the king and the truth." They are the product not of reason or rationality, as the five listed by Plato Mathematics and the lowest psychic abilities "eykasii" (eikasia - assimilation), the ability to create a similarity or guess at them on are like. »
In the physics of the nineteenth century it was believed that the body motion can be represented as savokupnosti material points which move along certain trajectories. Just describing wave processes which constitute the movement of energy in dense media. To understand what the question was enough to present in front of the sea: the particles (drops) move it vertically while the energy moves in waves. In the early twentieth century it became clear that the motion of particles in the microcosm (electrons, photons, protons, etc.) can not provide such unambiguous as it was in classical physics. If we continue the analogy with the sea, the elementary particle (drop) is already some real virtuality, namely: the sea is like in our imagination, and the particle can manifest itself in any part of it with a probability as to whether it is any drop of the sea . If a person wants to determine its location and for this sail to it - it is a sea change and thus alter the probability of finding a particle in one or another part of the sea, ie their presence will affect the structure of the sea and the wave field of the particle. This property became known as kaspuskulyarno particle-wave duality, ie particle at the same time inherent properties of solid point and wave. Failure to determine the true location of the particle is considered to be its inherent properties, the observer affects this property changing uncertainty.
   Now let us follow a similar phenomena in the art. Until the nineteenth century, artists were simply craftsmen, able to tolerate the creator of creation on canvas, paper and imprinted on the stone structures. In the early nineteenth century, the observed images have been insufficient, because artists turned to the study, descriptions and images of the spiritual world. Thus they showed karpuskulyarno wave-particle duality of art, where "karpuskula - solid" - it is the classical art, and "wave" - is energy, the spiritual part - contemporary art. Thus karpuskulyarno wave-particle duality in art - a unity of opposites, the unity of classical and contemporary art as a manifestation of the underlying laws of matter: a particle has the properties of waves (energy) has a unity of body and wave energy (spirit), the cosmos is matter and spirit. And here the same way if you want people to define what art is it objectively affects the wave, the energy essence of this notion. Thus each person becomes an independent creator, in his own way to express their vision of the truth. But the objective contradictions between contemporary art and classical no - it is one entity with a solid foundation and spirit of the virtual.

"The adjective eikos uses in his poem Parmenides, in the place where the Goddess, completing the" true word and talk about being "starts the story about the device space. It appeals to the youth-Parmenides with:
  "I tell thee, This mirostroy quite probable,
Do not you obskachet a conception of death ".
Likely (eoikota) means here - possibly together with other views of death and, therefore, not true, but unlike them "appropriate", "appropriate" truth (as suits a nice outfit), then there is a decent enough mirostroy to be told the Goddess man will know the truth and being. In the poem of Parmenides also occurs word myth:
"There remains only a myth ways ...."
Most interesting is that these words begins the famous transfer characteristics of true being: "that exists is not born, not subject to death, tselokupnoe, the Only ... here it is not more than there" etc. "

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 hours 51 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от natacha_m60

On this subject very well written S. Zweig in his book "Star Hours of mankind" (such as history of the Marseillaise), I recommend reading.

    I read ... Yes, and Rouget de Lisle, with whom there is a miracle, no more than the others understand the importance of what he has created a lunatic state
under the spell of a volatile spirit.