Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 21.05.2009, 12:11 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Новичок
 
Регистрация: 04.09.2008
Сообщений: 26
Спасибо: 0
Поблагодарили 40 раз(а) в 11 сообщениях
Репутация: 44
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
In the department of the twentieth century, the museum should be submitted to all the trends of domestic art.
Spectators vybirut themselves that they like and that there is "rubbish".
And who asked the audience something? As you see, asking only "geniuses", specialists in shit and pure, unblemished paint to canvas. Or you have noticed the endless line at the Museums "actual" art. The fact of the matter is that without massive, preferably outrageous, scandalous advertising these rotten foot, no one will want to sniff. And so - the higher the level dibilizma spectator, the offer large want to look at ass naked in the subway, or on the rusty batteries, instead of chandeliers hung example. in the Kremlin, etc. new art.
I agree that this kind of art - the art of shocking, but not art. And if so - nothing to do in the gallery of the same name.

Цитата:
In 1889, Vladimir Makovsky at the next dinner Wanderers threw Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov defiant phrase: "Since when Pavel, you have to inculcate in your gallery syphilis?".
Was this phrase did not like?
It reminds me of the simple truth: only the owner-collector of the right to determine thin. vision of their congregation. The current ideological exposition Tretyakov likened ignorant and as impudent apprentice who tries to write up something on a canvas of Rembrandt.



izofond вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо izofond за это полезное сообщение:
Buscador (25.07.2009), SergeiSK (21.05.2009), Tana (21.05.2009), Тютчев (26.07.2009), ФЕОФАН МУХИН (21.05.2009)