Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 21.05.2009, 11:02 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Гуру
 
Аватар для Кирилл Сызранский
 
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,397
Спасибо: 27,867
Поблагодарили 55,330 раз(а) в 24,283 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102390
Отправить сообщение для Кирилл Сызранский с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от izofond Посмотреть сообщение
For them, the temple should not be "a little dirty." And the question will ultimately be put where in principle: why in the museum, which was formed with a definite eye on the art, invades something that is fundamentally antagonistic to this view?
In the department of the twentieth century, the museum should be submitted to all the trends of domestic art.
Spectators vybirut themselves that they like and that there is "garbage."
P. Tretyakov bought pictures, "fresh" made here just now. And too often questionable for today.
Then somehow resulted in a sample comparison of the Cheka Malevich and "Girls, illuminated by the sun" (1888) by Valentin Serov.

Цитата:
Сообщение от Buscador Посмотреть сообщение
As for the children, then when I showed them reproductions, reaching the "Black Square", they asked me - and that is also a picture? I showed them "girl, lit by the sun" and asked "What do you prefer? You would not believe - v.Serov!
I recall that Pavel Tretyakov criticized for obtaining of this painting is the artists.
In 1889, Vladimir Makovsky at the next dinner Wanderers threw Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov defiant phrase: "Since when Pavel, you have to inculcate in your gallery syphilis?".
Was this phrase did not like?



Кирилл Сызранский вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 11 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Кирилл Сызранский за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (27.07.2009), Art-lover (21.05.2009), eva777 (21.05.2009), Glasha (21.05.2009), iosif (22.05.2009), Jasmin (21.05.2009), LCR (26.07.2009), qwerty (21.05.2009), Sandro (21.05.2009), Сима (21.05.2009), яня (21.05.2009)