Dear
Buscador!
Oh! It is necessary "for the market to respond, although enthusiasm and not return.
Be warned - if you want to see how I ishitryatsya demonstrate high artistic merit of the square - will be disappointed. : p
"Black Square", of course, - a work of avant-garde. Vanguard investigates the outer limits of art, ie his relationship with the audience, rather than its domestic laws, ie plasty. Thus, the problem of artistic quality in the forefront there. (Above, so that the masses it has become clearer in the twentieth century, many artists have worked from the "generals" - Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol, for example). For hud.kachestvom refer to traditional artists - not to the avant-garde and their descendants aktualschikam.
"Black box" - just a manifesto of free art. Freedom of figurative painting. For many centuries the question of such exemption was not raised, painting and had to combine their direct responsibilities - the study of spatial relationships with color and indirect - the transfer of visual information. Artists breathe more freely, strangely enough, with the advent of photos - there were those who could now be responsible for the "image" and, moreover, the similarity. Malevich painting was very fond of (though without reciprocity for a long time) and was glad facilitated her release. It was, and so clear, but it was necessary that someone gave "a visual signal. He gave.
Now, it seems no one is particularly necessary to prove that painting - art is no less abstract than music, for example (I mean, of course, not only with Kandinsky Malevich, but Vermeer with Cézanne (if in the previous picture). On This is best himself wrote Kazimierz (see his article "On the new systems in the art").
If you climb further into the forest, which at the forum, it seems to me not to do so (there is after all still the same book), it can be briefly recall that the square to Malevich - the element of his personal mythology (also important for the vanguard of the concept). This projection of a cube, a cube and a cross - the basis "Suprematist warrant. World Space system Malevich structured through their intersecting planes.
The trick is that in this case "individual mythology" as the artist had in mind all of humanity, that nearly a hundred years, we look at the world through the eyes of Malevich. He, his students, their "Suprematist order" - the basis of contemporary visual culture - from architecture to books, from Eisenstein to last clipmaker.
Hopefully, there were no what you mean by "philosophy".
Now, what about the pictures. I beg your pardon, in polemic fervor came lightly - again, you should answer, and not something to really want. But it seemed to me, many and misunderstood.
The first series - it is who
«on the one hand» - artists who are only interested in painting itself, so to speak - vertical art.
«On the other hand» - those who are more interested in the opportunity to become "the rulers of the minds", or at least earn some money (preferably both) - that is, those who are on the external boundaries of art, its horizontal.
"Pandora's Box" - contemporary art opened up all the common effort, one that completely ignored the "human", take a sky-high, others that vigorously played up to the mass consciousness.
In modern art, vertical, of course, quite low, and horizontal rather broad, but succumb to panic, it seems, should not - always has been. Cross their intersection still remains, on the contrary - the vectors have become even more clearly visible.
In general, let all the flowers bloom, eh?
[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
Oops I apologize to the previous speakers! : shy:
Konstantin for me already, in general, responded. Thank you!