Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
OK, you say, wring some way the paper. And who you buy it? There would be, for example, Petrov, and he put all his reasons, doubts and arguments. So? Nothing ... Everyone will know of the existence of this painting with a long train of stories and fables, but will buy it?
|
If you look closely at the first post, I think, is obvious: I do not want to grind. I want clarity. If the expert rejects the authenticity, there are reasons, though he described them. So no, it was said, in essence: a fake, because fake. And what to think?
As for the plume - yes.
Again, I formulated the questions that might be useful for the profane. Once articulate. Maybe you (or someone else from the experts) do not find it difficult to answer:
- Are there any hardware expertise to enable impact on expert opinion?
- Does the opinion of leading experts, that the validity of the proposal is equal to zero?
- Able to efficiently operate the market (sorry, just been interested in the abstract), in which the validity of a commodity is determined by eye by two=three men, even a very respected?
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
I you all simply and clearly explained. And that you had carefully read my answers, and no joke ...
But this is your business, how to perceive my words. I was serious. "Sloppy"? Maybe not for me to judge, but I wrote to you as is. Then, remember my words and understand what I told you the entire script.
|
I do not to you, and to ensure that you and another tovarisch associated me with the author of Topeka, to which I referred ... devil ... OK, let's forget.
You explained and I understood. And thank you, and sorry if that is not so.