13.05.2009, 17:01
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#16
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Semen Semenovich
I think you a bit confused - how to live, to breathe and smell - it is worth a lot (though there is more impressionism). But as in the photo - so it is with photos. This is not what - there is a good picture.
In your quotations - only the opinion of critics late 19 th century. Renoir - a genius to know that the essence of painting, went through the hard work craftsman (with gratitude), and admired the best works of previous generations, for hours worked in the Louvre. A lack of understanding - is a natural component of the older generations. The main base in the leading French Impressionist painting was high professionalism and talent. But it was and support - Courbet, Corot, Dobin ...
|
That's exactly what I wanted to say. Academism the enemy of art because they claim. not tolerate schemes. And do not la-la show properly.
|
|
|