LCR
Hence, what some of Van Gogh or Filonov (which I myself can not stand, but which is considered a great artist and that is expensive - is it not an argument for curator?) In the professional record does not, as they have never lived on the money from their work
Sovershenno pravil'no, nel'sia.
"It's easier than digging, fashionable naiveté" - and that's all you found?
Ia ze skazal, chto eto nekotorye idei.
but do not forget that a product, selling gallerist whose livelihood depends on, is created - or, if you prefer, is - an artist, that is, he stands at the basis of your wealth.
Vam uze zamechatel'no otvetil Iosif. Ot sebia dobavliu - productom iskusstvo delaet diler /galerist, a ne hudoznik.
artist can just go out (or go to the trading house Sotheby's - this also happens, and not so long ago, is not it?)
Takih polno na bloshinyh rynkah, a tot, chto byl s Sotheby's byl uze raskruchen i Vy znaete kem.
a little less condescension and contempt for your breadwinner
Vstan 'ukroi nogi kormil'tsu? presreniia net, est 'tviordoe ubezdenie.
Ninni
It is valuable to society - obschestvo est 'massa amorfnaia, seraia, nichego ne proizvodiaschiaia, ono sostoit is individualov, kotorye vsio i sozdaiut. Vopros ostaiotsia: Tsenno dlia kogo?
|