Quote:
As far as the dictates of ideology, here we are in the thrall of myths. Soviet art historians are well aware that the authorities were of the opinion that "should bloom all the flowers" - but, unlike the Chinese version, no repression was not at all.
Many people can not forget the famous "Bulldozer" exhibition, but this is an isolated example, and it is not due to overall policy, and personal predilections of Nikita Khrushchev, and, incidentally, precisely in 1960 in the Pushkin Museum to them. Pushkin in Moscow was an exhibition of Alexander Tischler - artist, personified unofficial art. The reality was that those artists who did not want to walk up the official ladder, could as easily create and even exhibitions.
|
Yeah, as the French say, better to read this, than to be blind
Artists, which Nikita Sergeyevich, having risen from the tomb, dispersed the bulldozers - it's cool! (just in case, a reminder: Bulldozer Exhibition held in 74 th year)
Quote:
Soviet art - a multifaceted phenomenon, and has not appreciated at its true worth. The market has not developed and is waiting for its customers. Now sold or first names, or those artists who have invested money in the gallery.
Another important point - in this market virtually no fakes. Many artists are doing so far, others have left the family, which has always been able to confirm the authenticity of works. Buying the work of a Soviet artist, you can be sure that you buy the original.
-----------------------------------------------
From the article: avt.Kira Obolenskaya. (Antique-Info).
-----------------------------------------------
|
It seems that sold not only the "first names, or those artists who have invested money in the gallery, and sold isusstvovedy