Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
I am interested in this issue 5 years, and not 20.Esli this rule change, a low bow to all lawyers and experts.
--------------------------------------------
|
In this case, you should not talk about an apparent contradiction to the norms of the Civil Code and Law on Import-Export (obviously, you are misled by certain statements made during the discussion of the topic), and the commutation of the current legislation. Lawyers, let us leave the question of eliminating conflicts of law.
On a personal note: legislators are unlikely to reach the abolition of special (longer) periods of acquisitive prescription. They can reduce, but not much. In any case, reduction of these deadlines will not solve other, more urgent problems (for the owner of cultural property) required for the court to establish ownership.
By the way, thanks, that drew my attention to an article by Mr. Mazein. However, after I considered vyrvany from the context of a piece, I decided was that I was supposed to be retired (the idea is formulated clearly, competently, and it was hard to imagine that this author does not take into account the issue of special regulation). Today found the second part of the paragraph, and everything fell into place. at the same time became acquainted with the author's position on other issues, and recommend that everyone who is working on propihivaniem changes. Retire too early.: D