Цитата:
Сообщение от OlgaV
Russia collectors nothing poddtverdit their property rights (except in those rare heirs who executed a certificate of inheritance), or that 99%of transactions in our art market at the current law be considered invalid (because I can not imagine any purchase agreement in writing form, except auctions)
- To properly justify the existence of these problems
|
Detached from the train, of course, not necessary. But you can also try to ride on several trains. Perhaps one of them at least until we reach a first reading, even after 5 years
)).
Right of property - generally a sore point, especially given the specificity of the subject, old and recent events, which resulted in changed owners. And it did not sound where the initiative for the possibility of recording individual transactions, the rights of subjects? For example, many of the questions (the owner of the establishment, authentication, etc.) in future may be lifted if there will be some roster (the rights of subjects, even what - it does not matter), and from which information can be obtained by request (a kind of symbiosis between companies -registrars and CRB). Maintaining registers, and control functions of state organs could in some cases, if we are not talking about natsdostoyanii, on expensive items (set limit), pass on to accredited commercial organizations. These organizations could provide and additional services: assessment, evaluation (which would be adopted with opredenenii tax base when calculating the customs fees, insurance costs), represent the interests of owners with exposure, transportation, disputes, etc.
By the way, the thing that has passed the registration could be established, and shorter periods of time when determining the length of the open-ownership, in some cases, a simplified procedure of customs clearance ...
However, in addition to plus or minus such a system, too, to fig: the risk of leakage bases, lack of professionalism, partisanship, etc.