Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
No, just open discussion.
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от voloviks
I feel like quoting VI Ulyanov (Lenin), which coincides with your statement. Let us also create artistic council, will allow a decent and smart.
|
Proposal for a closed section may not be popular. Archetypes, multiplied by the memory of Lenin ...
But we do not see the brain, heart, liver - and the glory of God. Thus, we can safely go about their business, rather than dwell on the contemplation of the internal organs.
There are clear arguments in favor of the proposed measures, to solve some problems, especially ethically, it is simply no credible alternative.
All the difficulties that have to rake now emerged in an atmosphere completely open discussions. What, one wonders, the presence of additional closed areas for special discussion prejudice any other public discussion?
If you follow the logic hard to overcome the closed, you can get full exhibitionism. Why no one has demanded disclosure for public viewing personal peripiski? Closed section - it's just more convenient equivalent of personal mail for exchange of views, and not the center of infringing someone's rights. And the artistic council has nothing to do with.
Цитата:
Сообщение от SergeiSK
Why are all of the above need? After a couple of months all this tricky system will fall under its own clumsiness.
|
When built the first airplane, many professors of physics prove that the system tricky under its own weight will never get off the ground.
This is just something going on simplification - eventually. Does anyone remember geometry? A lot of challenges gracefully and easily solved with little additional construction.
In general, the fundamental issues are not solved by voting (this does not apply to the issue of blogs). How long have stood the house where the issues of analysis of structures would not be solved by engineers, and alleged ballot slum? Common sense leaves residents arrangement of interiors.