Цитата:
Сообщение от Sergeyitch
From the photographs it is difficult to assess the quality of the paintings and the artist on a serious level. Who bought the painting at auction, knows that after the selection of the catalog to look alive. And the lion's share of the impact of painting - it is energy. Sometimes it is transmitted and through the monitor. In these pictures I did not feel it.
In this case, all the pictures of the plot. In this and the plus and minus. Plus - you can explore the characters and inventing stories. Less that considered once you stop doing so. Eyes large have nothing to learn.
|
Undoubtedly. Pictures should always look in reality. Some artists win at the screen, some lose. Fully agree with you.
I love figurative painting. Any picture - any style and content - can get bored and lose its impact - if ever before my eyes and look at it endlessly. Artwork should "go" and "return" and each time coming back - to take with a new story and fresh energy ...
By the way, you can get acquainted with new pictures of Constantine and the data on the
http://web.artprice.com
[color="# 666686"]Added after 19 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Munch
Dear Ninni,
in fact our views seem to coincide. We just found ways to share sarcasm for the artist to the characters. The idea of "Gogol's eyes" - wonderful! Believe me, I do not mind, I just thought (I admit that it's just different shades of the same intent) that Gogol was more ruthless to their characters and portrayed them more grotesque. I believe that the softness in the displacements on the surface of someone's callousness, "especially if the" someone "- the target audience of the artist is certainly reasonable. But it is a commercial "reasonableness".
|
I think that you are completely right, and although he has a very tough work still can not presume to judge.
It will be interesting to observe the turns of his work