[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

In museums - that lazy to walk!

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Cyril, I have already mentioned that Savrasov is weak. We are accustomed to the museum things, repeatedly published, those that hang in the Tretyakov Gallery for years. And there are those, like this. I have seen other works of similar quality. Korovin, too, is weak, but present. There is not quite udavshiesya things and other artists. The artist also a human being, not a machine for the production of masterpieces. A Savrasov was a very "human", and nothing human was alien to him. The fate of the artist, which is no longer with us - is "finished product". We have the ability to peer into the details of his life, finding new touches. But to deny the biography of the creator in order to preserve some ideal image, in my opinion, not correct. This picture shows the tragic fate of the artist.
Savrasov such it is, and perhaps that is why he gave us interesting and close. And without this figure history of Russian art would be some sort of incomplete.

Maybe this Savrasov of those? From the "weak", which you saw?