[Магнолия]

Taking advantage of the publicity, copy in this issue message Vasiliev journalist.

"Andrey Vasilyev
It seems to me that the author, guided by basic journalistic ethics could take and I comment on issues. However, this is why something happened. The specific issues - Mr. Soldatenkov somehow fails to mention in his story that the Museum's painting underwent a forensic examination in the State Tretyakov Gallery. There it is concluded that the painting underwent two restorations. Quote: In the study of the works identified extensive zones of intervention in the original author's paintings. In addition to glued in the restoration and tinted tears and losses along songs (recorded in the restoration passport provided by the Russian Museum) work ACTIVELY WRITTEN over the original layer.

I like yesterday at 14:58|Reply

Andrey Vasilyev
Late interventions are divided into two groups. The first is the restoration of the tears and losses at edges of sheet, made on a high professional level (reflected in the restoration passport provided by the RM). The second intensive recording whitewash and allosterism colors in the right half of the composition, on the upper edge and partially on the left side. Originally this record was considered as the author's processing so much and she actively changes the original author's intent...

I like yesterday at 15:02|Reply

Andrey Vasilyev
Well If You compare the official data of judicial examination with babble Soldatenkov, may be you will agree with mnazi that he was lying. Similar expertise I can provide and the quality of counterfeits. And much of the police report regarding the necessity of excitation of criminal case since July 2011 and the decisions of the courts regarding illegal inactivity I got a lot. Fortunately the matter is pending in court and shut up or lying about it now will fail. If You have any questions for me, I with pleasure will answer them
I like yesterday at 15:06|Reply
To comment on.. "